Bangladesh vs Thailand: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Bangladesh
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 822,662 t against 706,334 t in Bangladesh, a difference of 116,328 t.
That makes Thailand's figure about 1.2 times Bangladesh's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Thailand ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 16th and Thailand ranks 13th of 201 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 122,631 t | 219,029 t | 96,398 t | Thailand |
| 1970s | 154,392 t | 255,928 t | 101,536 t | Thailand |
| 1980s | 168,842 t | 318,796 t | 149,953 t | Thailand |
| 1990s | 249,304 t | 445,959 t | 196,655 t | Thailand |
| 2000s | 321,461 t | 454,758 t | 133,297 t | Thailand |
| 2010s | 537,329 t | 620,834 t | 83,505 t | Thailand |
| 2020s | 657,771 t | 737,599 t | 79,828 t | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Bangladesh or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 822,662 t against 706,334 t in Bangladesh as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Bangladesh and Thailand?
- 116,328 t, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Thailand?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Thailand rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Bangladesh ranks 16th and Thailand ranks 13th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).