Barbados vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Barbados
- China, Hong Kong SAR
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 803.73 t against 788.26 t in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 15.47 t.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 174th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 175th of 201 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | China, Hong Kong SAR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,921 t | 1,467 t | 1,453 t | Barbados |
| 1970s | 2,727 t | 1,924 t | 803.67 t | Barbados |
| 1980s | 2,320 t | 1,830 t | 490.49 t | Barbados |
| 1990s | 1,570 t | 920.31 t | 649.23 t | Barbados |
| 2000s | 829.62 t | 770.55 t | 59.06 t | Barbados |
| 2010s | 829.31 t | 822.77 t | 6.54 t | Barbados |
| 2020s | 796.19 t | 794.31 t | 1.87 t | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Barbados or China, Hong Kong SAR?
- Barbados, at 803.73 t against 788.26 t in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Barbados and China, Hong Kong SAR?
- 15.47 t, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and China, Hong Kong SAR?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and China, Hong Kong SAR rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Barbados ranks 174th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 175th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).