Barbados vs Djibouti: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Barbados
- Djibouti
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 803.73 t against 686.06 t in Djibouti, a difference of 117.67 t.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.2 times Djibouti's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 174th and Djibouti ranks 177th of 201 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Djibouti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,921 t | 771.99 t | 2,149 t | Barbados |
| 1970s | 2,727 t | 881.52 t | 1,846 t | Barbados |
| 1980s | 2,320 t | 501.93 t | 1,818 t | Barbados |
| 1990s | 1,570 t | 581.81 t | 987.74 t | Barbados |
| 2000s | 829.62 t | 658.69 t | 170.93 t | Barbados |
| 2010s | 829.31 t | 674.46 t | 154.85 t | Barbados |
| 2020s | 796.19 t | 684.4 t | 111.78 t | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Barbados or Djibouti?
- Barbados, at 803.73 t against 686.06 t in Djibouti as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Barbados and Djibouti?
- 117.67 t, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Djibouti?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and Djibouti rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Barbados ranks 174th and Djibouti ranks 177th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).