Belarus vs Eastern Africa: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Belarus
- Eastern Africa
How they compare
Eastern Africa currently reports 874,840 t against 519,436 t in Belarus, a difference of 355,404 t.
That makes Eastern Africa's figure about 1.7 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 21st and Eastern Africa ranks 23rd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Eastern Africa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Eastern Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 553,320 t | 386,273 t | 167,046 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 528,200 t | 471,384 t | 56,816 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 567,783 t | 678,326 t | 110,543 t | Eastern Africa |
| 2020s | 514,979 t | 834,423 t | 319,444 t | Eastern Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Belarus or Eastern Africa?
- Eastern Africa, at 874,840 t against 519,436 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Belarus and Eastern Africa?
- 355,404 t, with Eastern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Eastern Africa?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Eastern Africa rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Belarus ranks 21st and Eastern Africa ranks 23rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).