Belarus vs Italy: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Belarus
- Italy
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 519,436 t against 502,884 t in Italy, a difference of 16,552 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 21st and Italy ranks 22nd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Italy in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 553,320 t | 823,717 t | 270,397 t | Italy |
| 2000s | 528,200 t | 672,642 t | 144,442 t | Italy |
| 2010s | 567,783 t | 527,236 t | 40,547 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 514,979 t | 511,806 t | 3,173 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Belarus or Italy?
- Belarus, at 519,436 t against 502,884 t in Italy as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Belarus and Italy?
- 16,552 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Italy?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Italy rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Belarus ranks 21st and Italy ranks 22nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).