Belarus vs Northern Europe: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Belarus
- Northern Europe
How they compare
Northern Europe currently reports 1.14 million t against 519,436 t in Belarus, a difference of 619,314 t.
That makes Northern Europe's figure about 2.2 times Belarus's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Northern Europe has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 21st and Northern Europe ranks 20th of 201 countries.
Northern Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Northern Europe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 553,320 t | 1.69 million t | 1.13 million t | Northern Europe |
| 2000s | 528,200 t | 1.38 million t | 850,629 t | Northern Europe |
| 2010s | 567,783 t | 1.26 million t | 695,206 t | Northern Europe |
| 2020s | 514,979 t | 1.21 million t | 698,581 t | Northern Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Belarus or Northern Europe?
- Northern Europe, at 1.14 million t against 519,436 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Belarus and Northern Europe?
- 619,314 t, with Northern Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Northern Europe?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Northern Europe rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Belarus ranks 21st and Northern Europe ranks 20th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).