Belarus vs Southern Europe: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Belarus
- Southern Europe
How they compare
Southern Europe currently reports 1.68 million t against 519,436 t in Belarus, a difference of 1.16 million t.
That makes Southern Europe's figure about 3.2 times Belarus's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Southern Europe has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 21st and Southern Europe ranks 19th of 201 countries.
Southern Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Southern Europe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 553,320 t | 2.32 million t | 1.76 million t | Southern Europe |
| 2000s | 528,200 t | 2.12 million t | 1.59 million t | Southern Europe |
| 2010s | 567,783 t | 1.84 million t | 1.27 million t | Southern Europe |
| 2020s | 514,979 t | 1.78 million t | 1.27 million t | Southern Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Belarus or Southern Europe?
- Southern Europe, at 1.68 million t against 519,436 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Belarus and Southern Europe?
- 1.16 million t, with Southern Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Southern Europe?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Southern Europe rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Belarus ranks 21st and Southern Europe ranks 19th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).