Belgium vs Paraguay: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Belgium
- Paraguay
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 187,544 t against 175,734 t in Paraguay, a difference of 11,810 t.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Paraguay's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 43rd and Paraguay ranks 45th of 201 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 234,529 t | 89,147 t | 145,382 t | Belgium |
| 2010s | 206,954 t | 141,239 t | 65,716 t | Belgium |
| 2020s | 194,835 t | 154,384 t | 40,451 t | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Belgium or Paraguay?
- Belgium, at 187,544 t against 175,734 t in Paraguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Belgium and Paraguay?
- 11,810 t, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Paraguay?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Paraguay rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Belgium ranks 43rd and Paraguay ranks 45th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).