Belgium vs South Africa: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Belgium
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 189,463 t against 187,544 t in Belgium, a difference of 1,919 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 41st and South Africa ranks 40th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 234,529 t | 135,700 t | 98,828 t | Belgium |
| 2010s | 206,954 t | 167,669 t | 39,285 t | Belgium |
| 2020s | 194,835 t | 215,675 t | 20,840 t | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Belgium or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 189,463 t against 187,544 t in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Belgium and South Africa?
- 1,919 t, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and South Africa?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and South Africa rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Belgium ranks 41st and South Africa ranks 40th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).