Belize vs Sierra Leone: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Belize
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 5,797 t against 5,503 t in Belize, a difference of 294 t.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.1 times Belize's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Belize ranks 151st and Sierra Leone ranks 149th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 1 and Sierra Leone in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 428.54 t | 1,164 t | 735.77 t | Sierra Leone |
| 1970s | 587.12 t | 1,526 t | 939.33 t | Sierra Leone |
| 1980s | 1,195 t | 1,943 t | 748.57 t | Sierra Leone |
| 1990s | 1,628 t | 2,339 t | 711.5 t | Sierra Leone |
| 2000s | 1,155 t | 1,767 t | 611.58 t | Sierra Leone |
| 2010s | 4,401 t | 4,380 t | 21.76 t | Belize |
| 2020s | 5,826 t | 5,833 t | 6.74 t | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Belize or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 5,797 t against 5,503 t in Belize as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Belize and Sierra Leone?
- 294 t, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Sierra Leone?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Belize and Sierra Leone rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Belize ranks 151st and Sierra Leone ranks 149th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).