Benin vs El Salvador: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Benin
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 27,907 t against 26,515 t in Benin, a difference of 1,392 t.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Benin's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.
Benin ranks 116th and El Salvador ranks 113th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Benin averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,089 t | 19,884 t | 14,795 t | El Salvador |
| 1970s | 6,481 t | 22,815 t | 16,333 t | El Salvador |
| 1980s | 8,672 t | 18,179 t | 9,506 t | El Salvador |
| 1990s | 13,553 t | 22,972 t | 9,419 t | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 12,582 t | 27,007 t | 14,425 t | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 19,860 t | 28,163 t | 8,303 t | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 37,348 t | 29,228 t | 8,120 t | Benin |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Benin or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 27,907 t against 26,515 t in Benin as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Benin and El Salvador?
- 1,392 t, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and El Salvador?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Benin and El Salvador rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Benin ranks 116th and El Salvador ranks 113th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).