Benin vs Estonia: Input — Cropland potassium

Benin
26,515 t
in 2023
Estonia
24,452 t
in 2023
Benin rank
116th
Estonia rank
119th

Input — Cropland potassium over time

  • Benin
  • Estonia
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Benin currently reports 26,515 t against 24,452 t in Estonia, a difference of 2,063 t.

That makes Benin's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.

Benin ranks 116th and Estonia ranks 119th of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Benin averaged higher in 1 and Estonia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Benin Estonia Difference Ahead
1990s 14,416 t 41,667 t 27,251 t Estonia
2000s 12,582 t 25,568 t 12,986 t Estonia
2010s 19,860 t 28,051 t 8,191 t Estonia
2020s 37,348 t 27,635 t 9,713 t Benin

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Benin or Estonia?
Benin, at 26,515 t against 24,452 t in Estonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Benin and Estonia?
2,063 t, with Benin ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Estonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Benin and Estonia rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
Benin ranks 116th and Estonia ranks 119th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).