Bhutan vs Gambia: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Bhutan
- Gambia
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 2,195 t against 1,469 t in Gambia, a difference of 726 t.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.5 times Gambia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 166th and Gambia ranks 169th of 201 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,532 t | 532.45 t | 999.96 t | Bhutan |
| 1970s | 1,887 t | 731.77 t | 1,155 t | Bhutan |
| 1980s | 2,433 t | 1,018 t | 1,415 t | Bhutan |
| 1990s | 1,958 t | 1,061 t | 896.51 t | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 1,987 t | 1,458 t | 529.08 t | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 2,350 t | 1,374 t | 976.39 t | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 2,406 t | 1,104 t | 1,302 t | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Bhutan or Gambia?
- Bhutan, at 2,195 t against 1,469 t in Gambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Bhutan and Gambia?
- 726 t, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Gambia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Gambia rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Bhutan ranks 166th and Gambia ranks 169th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).