Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Zimbabwe: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 35,617 t against 31,774 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 3,843 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 100th and Zimbabwe ranks 97th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 41,745 t | 42,312 t | 566.89 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 46,137 t | 29,214 t | 16,923 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 45,230 t | 36,474 t | 8,756 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 35,008 t | 36,494 t | 1,487 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 35,617 t against 31,774 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zimbabwe?
- 3,843 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zimbabwe?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Zimbabwe rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 100th and Zimbabwe ranks 97th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).