Botswana vs Qatar: Input — Cropland potassium

Botswana
4,030 t
in 2023
Qatar
3,864 t
in 2023
Botswana rank
159th
Qatar rank
161st

Input — Cropland potassium over time

  • Botswana
  • Qatar
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 4,030 t against 3,864 t in Qatar, a difference of 166 t.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 159th and Qatar ranks 161st of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 6 and Qatar in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Qatar Difference Ahead
1960s 2,739 t 97.94 t 2,641 t Botswana
1970s 3,852 t 110.28 t 3,742 t Botswana
1980s 4,419 t 176.44 t 4,243 t Botswana
1990s 2,967 t 408.26 t 2,559 t Botswana
2000s 2,929 t 924.44 t 2,004 t Botswana
2010s 2,767 t 2,119 t 648.32 t Botswana
2020s 2,842 t 3,539 t 696.25 t Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Botswana or Qatar?
Botswana, at 4,030 t against 3,864 t in Qatar as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Botswana and Qatar?
166 t, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Qatar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Qatar rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
Botswana ranks 159th and Qatar ranks 161st of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).