Brunei Darussalam vs Lesotho: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 2,349 t against 1,767 t in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 582 t.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.3 times Brunei Darussalam's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 168th and Lesotho ranks 165th of 201 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 692.2 t | 1,930 t | 1,238 t | Lesotho |
| 1970s | 746.86 t | 2,293 t | 1,546 t | Lesotho |
| 1980s | 757.81 t | 2,350 t | 1,592 t | Lesotho |
| 1990s | 788.89 t | 3,378 t | 2,589 t | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 1,297 t | 3,529 t | 2,232 t | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 1,533 t | 2,679 t | 1,147 t | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 1,759 t | 2,214 t | 454.73 t | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Brunei Darussalam or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 2,349 t against 1,767 t in Brunei Darussalam as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Brunei Darussalam and Lesotho?
- 582 t, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Lesotho?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Lesotho rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 168th and Lesotho ranks 165th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).