Bulgaria vs Finland: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Bulgaria
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 61,124 t against 57,528 t in Bulgaria, a difference of 3,596 t.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Bulgaria's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 92nd and Finland ranks 90th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Bulgaria averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 152,523 t | 183,710 t | 31,187 t | Finland |
| 1970s | 182,809 t | 189,604 t | 6,796 t | Finland |
| 1980s | 248,279 t | 177,771 t | 70,508 t | Bulgaria |
| 1990s | 108,943 t | 120,135 t | 11,192 t | Finland |
| 2000s | 58,242 t | 92,754 t | 34,512 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 65,157 t | 70,396 t | 5,239 t | Finland |
| 2020s | 62,196 t | 65,526 t | 3,330 t | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Bulgaria or Finland?
- Finland, at 61,124 t against 57,528 t in Bulgaria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Bulgaria and Finland?
- 3,596 t, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Finland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bulgaria and Finland rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Bulgaria ranks 92nd and Finland ranks 90th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).