Bulgaria vs Zambia: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Bulgaria
- Zambia
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 57,528 t against 48,904 t in Zambia, a difference of 8,624 t.
That makes Bulgaria's figure about 1.2 times Zambia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Bulgaria has been ahead every year.
Bulgaria ranks 92nd and Zambia ranks 95th of 201 countries.
Bulgaria has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 152,523 t | 4,809 t | 147,714 t | Bulgaria |
| 1970s | 182,809 t | 9,799 t | 173,010 t | Bulgaria |
| 1980s | 248,279 t | 12,001 t | 236,278 t | Bulgaria |
| 1990s | 108,943 t | 14,434 t | 94,510 t | Bulgaria |
| 2000s | 58,242 t | 22,281 t | 35,961 t | Bulgaria |
| 2010s | 65,157 t | 34,588 t | 30,569 t | Bulgaria |
| 2020s | 62,196 t | 54,606 t | 7,589 t | Bulgaria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Bulgaria or Zambia?
- Bulgaria, at 57,528 t against 48,904 t in Zambia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Bulgaria and Zambia?
- 8,624 t, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Zambia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Bulgaria and Zambia rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Bulgaria ranks 92nd and Zambia ranks 95th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).