Burkina Faso vs Ethiopia PDR: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Burkina Faso
- Ethiopia PDR
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 70,416 t against 64,356 t in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 6,060 t.
That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia PDR's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia PDR has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 77th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 80th of 186 countries.
Ethiopia PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Ethiopia PDR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6,509 t | 51,748 t | 45,239 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1970s | 8,365 t | 54,661 t | 46,296 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 14,799 t | 58,134 t | 43,335 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1990s | 19,122 t | 63,345 t | 44,224 t | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Burkina Faso or Ethiopia PDR?
- Burkina Faso, at 70,416 t against 64,356 t in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Burkina Faso and Ethiopia PDR?
- 6,060 t, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Ethiopia PDR?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Burkina Faso and Ethiopia PDR rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Burkina Faso ranks 77th and Ethiopia PDR ranks 80th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).