Burkina Faso vs South Sudan, Republic of: Input β Cropland potassium
Input β Cropland potassium over time
- Burkina Faso
- South Sudan, Republic of
How they compare
South Sudan, Republic of currently reports 70,564 t against 70,416 t in Burkina Faso, a difference of 148 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan, Republic of ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 77th and South Sudan, Republic of ranks 76th of 185 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan, Republic of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | South Sudan, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 63,819 t | 62,507 t | 1,312 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 59,435 t | 69,159 t | 9,724 t | South Sudan, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input β cropland potassium, Burkina Faso or South Sudan, Republic of?
- South Sudan, Republic of, at 70,564 t against 70,416 t in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input β cropland potassium between Burkina Faso and South Sudan, Republic of?
- 148 t, with South Sudan, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and South Sudan, Republic of?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and South Sudan, Republic of rank globally for input β cropland potassium?
- Burkina Faso ranks 77th and South Sudan, Republic of ranks 76th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).