Cabo Verde vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Input β€” Cropland potassium

Cabo Verde
775.86 t
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR
788.26 t
in 2023
Cabo Verde rank
176th
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
175th

Input β€” Cropland potassium over time

  • Cabo Verde
  • China, Hong Kong SAR
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 788.26 t against 775.86 t in Cabo Verde, a difference of 12.4 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

Cabo Verde ranks 176th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 175th of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cabo Verde averaged higher in 3 and China, Hong Kong SAR in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cabo Verde China, Hong Kong SAR Difference Ahead
1960s 204.42 t 1,467 t 1,263 t China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 269.44 t 1,924 t 1,654 t China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 632.18 t 1,830 t 1,198 t China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 1,482 t 920.31 t 561.48 t Cabo Verde
2000s 1,239 t 770.55 t 468.3 t Cabo Verde
2010s 838.04 t 822.77 t 15.28 t Cabo Verde
2020s 770.29 t 794.31 t 24.03 t China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input β€” cropland potassium, Cabo Verde or China, Hong Kong SAR?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 788.26 t against 775.86 t in Cabo Verde as of 2023.
What is the difference in input β€” cropland potassium between Cabo Verde and China, Hong Kong SAR?
12.4 t, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and China, Hong Kong SAR?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cabo Verde and China, Hong Kong SAR rank globally for input β€” cropland potassium?
Cabo Verde ranks 176th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 175th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input β€” Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cabo Verde vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Input β€” Cropland potassium. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/input-cropland-potassium/cabo-verde-2/china-hong-kong-sar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/input-cropland-potassium/cabo-verde-2/china-hong-kong-sar/">Cabo Verde vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Input β€” Cropland potassium</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Input β€” Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).