Cabo Verde vs Czechoslovakia: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Cabo Verde
- Czechoslovakia
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 295,759 t against 775.86 t in Cabo Verde, a difference of 294,983 t.
That makes Czechoslovakia's figure about 381.2 times Cabo Verde's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 29th and Czechoslovakia ranks 30th of 29 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Czechoslovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 204.42 t | 629,321 t | 629,117 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 269.44 t | 884,285 t | 884,016 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 632.18 t | 838,325 t | 837,693 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 1,331 t | 435,336 t | 434,005 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Cabo Verde or Czechoslovakia?
- Czechoslovakia, at 295,759 t against 775.86 t in Cabo Verde as of 1992.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Cabo Verde and Czechoslovakia?
- 294,983 t, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Czechoslovakia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Cabo Verde and Czechoslovakia rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Cabo Verde ranks 29th and Czechoslovakia ranks 30th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).