Cabo Verde vs Djibouti: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Cabo Verde
- Djibouti
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 775.86 t against 686.06 t in Djibouti, a difference of 89.8 t.
That makes Cabo Verde's figure about 1.1 times Djibouti's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Djibouti ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 176th and Djibouti ranks 177th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cabo Verde averaged higher in 5 and Djibouti in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Djibouti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 204.42 t | 771.99 t | 567.57 t | Djibouti |
| 1970s | 269.44 t | 881.52 t | 612.08 t | Djibouti |
| 1980s | 632.18 t | 501.93 t | 130.25 t | Cabo Verde |
| 1990s | 1,482 t | 581.81 t | 899.99 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2000s | 1,239 t | 658.69 t | 580.17 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2010s | 838.04 t | 674.46 t | 163.58 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2020s | 770.29 t | 684.4 t | 85.89 t | Cabo Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Cabo Verde or Djibouti?
- Cabo Verde, at 775.86 t against 686.06 t in Djibouti as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Cabo Verde and Djibouti?
- 89.8 t, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Djibouti?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Djibouti rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Cabo Verde ranks 176th and Djibouti ranks 177th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).