Cambodia vs Tajikistan: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Cambodia
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 98,468 t against 96,144 t in Tajikistan, a difference of 2,324 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Cambodia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 66th and Tajikistan ranks 68th of 201 countries.
Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 77,850 t | 45,341 t | 32,509 t | Cambodia |
| 2000s | 87,119 t | 50,277 t | 36,842 t | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 89,107 t | 82,639 t | 6,468 t | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 100,375 t | 97,454 t | 2,921 t | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Cambodia or Tajikistan?
- Cambodia, at 98,468 t against 96,144 t in Tajikistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Cambodia and Tajikistan?
- 2,324 t, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cambodia and Tajikistan rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Cambodia ranks 66th and Tajikistan ranks 68th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).