Canada vs France: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Canada
- France
How they compare
France currently reports 1.01 million t against 895,226 t in Canada, a difference of 119,444 t.
That makes France's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, France has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 12th and France ranks 10th of 201 countries.
France has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | France | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 453,113 t | 1.87 million t | 1.42 million t | France |
| 1970s | 490,111 t | 2.36 million t | 1.87 million t | France |
| 1980s | 555,064 t | 2.54 million t | 1.98 million t | France |
| 1990s | 511,177 t | 2.10 million t | 1.59 million t | France |
| 2000s | 495,990 t | 1.55 million t | 1.05 million t | France |
| 2010s | 545,984 t | 1.24 million t | 695,983 t | France |
| 2020s | 851,252 t | 1.10 million t | 244,764 t | France |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Canada or France?
- France, at 1.01 million t against 895,226 t in Canada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Canada and France?
- 119,444 t, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and France?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Canada and France rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Canada ranks 12th and France ranks 10th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).