Canada vs Republic of Moldova: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Canada
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Canada currently reports 895,226 t against 24,860 t in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 870,366 t.
That makes Canada's figure about 36.0 times Republic of Moldova's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 12th and Republic of Moldova ranks 14th of 186 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 512,852 t | 57,812 t | 455,040 t | Canada |
| 2000s | 495,990 t | 28,906 t | 467,085 t | Canada |
| 2010s | 545,984 t | 25,915 t | 520,069 t | Canada |
| 2020s | 851,252 t | 25,310 t | 825,942 t | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Canada or Republic of Moldova?
- Canada, at 895,226 t against 24,860 t in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Canada and Republic of Moldova?
- 870,366 t, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Republic of Moldova?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Canada and Republic of Moldova rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Canada ranks 12th and Republic of Moldova ranks 14th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).