Canada vs Viet Nam: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Canada
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Canada currently reports 895,226 t against 708,468 t in Viet Nam, a difference of 186,758 t.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.3 times Viet Nam's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 12th and Viet Nam ranks 15th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 5 and Viet Nam in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 453,113 t | 130,524 t | 322,589 t | Canada |
| 1970s | 490,111 t | 140,835 t | 349,276 t | Canada |
| 1980s | 555,064 t | 175,944 t | 379,120 t | Canada |
| 1990s | 511,177 t | 288,721 t | 222,456 t | Canada |
| 2000s | 495,990 t | 580,122 t | 84,131 t | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 545,984 t | 743,682 t | 197,698 t | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 851,252 t | 792,741 t | 58,511 t | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Canada or Viet Nam?
- Canada, at 895,226 t against 708,468 t in Viet Nam as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Canada and Viet Nam?
- 186,758 t, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Viet Nam?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Canada and Viet Nam rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Canada ranks 12th and Viet Nam ranks 15th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).