Caribbean vs Ethiopia: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Caribbean
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Caribbean currently reports 153,460 t against 146,449 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 7,011 t.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Caribbean has been ahead every year.
Caribbean ranks 48th and Ethiopia ranks 51st of 201 countries.
Caribbean has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 198,338 t | 60,416 t | 137,922 t | Caribbean |
| 2000s | 159,279 t | 80,683 t | 78,596 t | Caribbean |
| 2010s | 189,222 t | 133,146 t | 56,076 t | Caribbean |
| 2020s | 158,126 t | 139,046 t | 19,080 t | Caribbean |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Caribbean or Ethiopia?
- Caribbean, at 153,460 t against 146,449 t in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Caribbean and Ethiopia?
- 7,011 t, with Caribbean ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Ethiopia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Caribbean and Ethiopia rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Caribbean ranks 48th and Ethiopia ranks 51st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).