Central African Republic vs Czechoslovakia: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Central African Republic
- Czechoslovakia
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 295,759 t against 16,531 t in Central African Republic, a difference of 279,228 t.
That makes Czechoslovakia's figure about 17.9 times Central African Republic's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 32nd and Czechoslovakia ranks 31st of 32 groups.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Czechoslovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,464 t | 629,321 t | 627,857 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 2,950 t | 884,285 t | 881,335 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 5,918 t | 838,325 t | 832,407 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 7,713 t | 435,336 t | 427,623 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Central African Republic or Czechoslovakia?
- Czechoslovakia, at 295,759 t against 16,531 t in Central African Republic as of 1992.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Central African Republic and Czechoslovakia?
- 279,228 t, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Czechoslovakia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Central African Republic and Czechoslovakia rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Central African Republic ranks 32nd and Czechoslovakia ranks 31st of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).