Central African Republic vs Japan: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Central African Republic
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 258,192 t against 16,531 t in Central African Republic, a difference of 241,661 t.
That makes Japan's figure about 15.6 times Central African Republic's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 32nd and Japan ranks 35th of 32 groups.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,464 t | 554,441 t | 552,977 t | Japan |
| 1970s | 2,950 t | 614,386 t | 611,436 t | Japan |
| 1980s | 5,918 t | 600,424 t | 594,507 t | Japan |
| 1990s | 8,772 t | 509,016 t | 500,244 t | Japan |
| 2000s | 12,278 t | 408,076 t | 395,797 t | Japan |
| 2010s | 15,828 t | 344,043 t | 328,215 t | Japan |
| 2020s | 16,447 t | 283,855 t | 267,408 t | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Central African Republic or Japan?
- Japan, at 258,192 t against 16,531 t in Central African Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Central African Republic and Japan?
- 241,661 t, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Japan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Central African Republic and Japan rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Central African Republic ranks 32nd and Japan ranks 35th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).