Central America vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Input — Cropland potassium

Central America
936,810 t
in 2023
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
496,275 t
in 2023
Central America rank
20th
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
22nd

Input — Cropland potassium over time

  • Central America
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M196119922023

How they compare

Central America currently reports 936,810 t against 496,275 t in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 440,535 t.

That makes Central America's figure about 1.9 times United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.

Central America ranks 20th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 22nd of 29 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central America averaged higher in 3 and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central America United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
1960s 256,898 t 768,470 t 511,572 t United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
1970s 381,970 t 805,966 t 423,996 t United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
1980s 473,838 t 823,414 t 349,576 t United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
1990s 536,005 t 767,497 t 231,492 t United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2000s 721,133 t 618,852 t 102,280 t Central America
2010s 903,396 t 551,024 t 352,373 t Central America
2020s 998,278 t 516,834 t 481,444 t Central America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Central America or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
Central America, at 936,810 t against 496,275 t in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Central America and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
440,535 t, with Central America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central America and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Central America and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
Central America ranks 20th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 22nd of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central America vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/input-cropland-potassium/central-america/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/input-cropland-potassium/central-america/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/">Central America vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Input — Cropland potassium</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).