Central Asia vs Colombia: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Central Asia
- Colombia
How they compare
Central Asia currently reports 1.11 million t against 575,231 t in Colombia, a difference of 537,319 t.
That makes Central Asia's figure about 1.9 times Colombia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Central Asia has been ahead every year.
Central Asia ranks 21st and Colombia ranks 19th of 32 groups.
Central Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Colombia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 687,920 t | 155,168 t | 532,752 t | Central Asia |
| 1970s | 850,331 t | 187,889 t | 662,442 t | Central Asia |
| 1980s | 965,743 t | 265,780 t | 699,963 t | Central Asia |
| 1990s | 716,004 t | 416,017 t | 299,987 t | Central Asia |
| 2000s | 637,566 t | 509,188 t | 128,377 t | Central Asia |
| 2010s | 909,007 t | 566,930 t | 342,077 t | Central Asia |
| 2020s | 1.06 million t | 586,637 t | 472,356 t | Central Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Central Asia or Colombia?
- Central Asia, at 1.11 million t against 575,231 t in Colombia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Central Asia and Colombia?
- 537,319 t, with Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Colombia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Central Asia and Colombia rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Central Asia ranks 21st and Colombia ranks 19th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).