Chad vs Nepal: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Chad
- Nepal
How they compare
Chad currently reports 80,556 t against 79,929 t in Nepal, a difference of 627 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nepal ahead.
Chad ranks 75th and Nepal ranks 76th of 201 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8,494 t | 38,991 t | 30,497 t | Nepal |
| 1970s | 9,001 t | 50,434 t | 41,433 t | Nepal |
| 1980s | 11,198 t | 64,450 t | 53,252 t | Nepal |
| 1990s | 17,938 t | 73,376 t | 55,438 t | Nepal |
| 2000s | 29,922 t | 86,762 t | 56,840 t | Nepal |
| 2010s | 50,219 t | 106,746 t | 56,527 t | Nepal |
| 2020s | 72,905 t | 108,470 t | 35,565 t | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Chad or Nepal?
- Chad, at 80,556 t against 79,929 t in Nepal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Chad and Nepal?
- 627 t, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Nepal?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Nepal rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Chad ranks 75th and Nepal ranks 76th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).