Chad vs Nicaragua: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Chad
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 81,354 t against 80,556 t in Chad, a difference of 798 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 69th and Nicaragua ranks 68th of 186 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8,494 t | 21,632 t | 13,138 t | Nicaragua |
| 1970s | 9,001 t | 30,177 t | 21,176 t | Nicaragua |
| 1980s | 11,198 t | 23,103 t | 11,905 t | Nicaragua |
| 1990s | 17,938 t | 24,090 t | 6,152 t | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 29,922 t | 56,158 t | 26,236 t | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 50,219 t | 71,170 t | 20,951 t | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 72,905 t | 83,527 t | 10,621 t | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Chad or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 81,354 t against 80,556 t in Chad as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Chad and Nicaragua?
- 798 t, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Nicaragua?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Nicaragua rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Chad ranks 69th and Nicaragua ranks 68th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).