Chile vs Czechia: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Chile
- Czechia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 93,730 t against 83,641 t in Chile, a difference of 10,089 t.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 71st and Czechia ranks 69th of 201 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 97,119 t | 161,966 t | 64,847 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 81,557 t | 120,147 t | 38,590 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 75,033 t | 105,854 t | 30,822 t | Czechia |
| 2020s | 81,815 t | 92,751 t | 10,935 t | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Chile or Czechia?
- Czechia, at 93,730 t against 83,641 t in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Chile and Czechia?
- 10,089 t, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Czechia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Czechia rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Chile ranks 71st and Czechia ranks 69th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).