Chile vs Tajikistan: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Chile
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 96,144 t against 83,641 t in Chile, a difference of 12,503 t.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 65th and Tajikistan ranks 62nd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Tajikistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 93,667 t | 45,341 t | 48,326 t | Chile |
| 2000s | 81,557 t | 50,277 t | 31,280 t | Chile |
| 2010s | 75,033 t | 82,639 t | 7,606 t | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 81,815 t | 97,454 t | 15,639 t | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Chile or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 96,144 t against 83,641 t in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Chile and Tajikistan?
- 12,503 t, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Tajikistan rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Chile ranks 65th and Tajikistan ranks 62nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).