China, mainland vs USSR: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- China, mainland
- USSR
How they compare
China, mainland currently reports 12.04 million t against 12.02 million t in USSR, a difference of 13,300 t.
Across all 31 years both countries report, USSR has been ahead every year.
China, mainland ranks 2nd and USSR ranks 3rd of 201 countries.
USSR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, mainland | USSR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.97 million t | 7.25 million t | 5.28 million t | USSR |
| 1970s | 2.60 million t | 10.73 million t | 8.13 million t | USSR |
| 1980s | 3.62 million t | 13.25 million t | 9.63 million t | USSR |
| 1990s | 5.24 million t | 12.09 million t | 6.85 million t | USSR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, China, mainland or USSR?
- China, mainland, at 12.04 million t against 12.02 million t in USSR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between China, mainland and USSR?
- 13,300 t, with China, mainland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, mainland and USSR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do China, mainland and USSR rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- China, mainland ranks 2nd and USSR ranks 3rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).