Colombia vs Uzbekistan: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Colombia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 592,471 t against 575,231 t in Colombia, a difference of 17,240 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 19th and Uzbekistan ranks 18th of 201 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 421,112 t | 232,126 t | 188,986 t | Colombia |
| 2000s | 509,188 t | 239,111 t | 270,077 t | Colombia |
| 2010s | 566,930 t | 412,130 t | 154,800 t | Colombia |
| 2020s | 586,637 t | 539,614 t | 47,023 t | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Colombia or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 592,471 t against 575,231 t in Colombia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Colombia and Uzbekistan?
- 17,240 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Colombia and Uzbekistan rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Colombia ranks 19th and Uzbekistan ranks 18th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).