Comoros vs Kiribati: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Comoros
- Kiribati
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 246.02 t against 173.47 t in Kiribati, a difference of 72.55 t.
That makes Comoros's figure about 1.4 times Kiribati's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 190th and Kiribati ranks 193rd of 201 countries.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 201.88 t | 72.41 t | 129.47 t | Comoros |
| 1970s | 225.77 t | 77.16 t | 148.61 t | Comoros |
| 1980s | 228.25 t | 83.58 t | 144.67 t | Comoros |
| 1990s | 242.4 t | 90.64 t | 151.76 t | Comoros |
| 2000s | 189.17 t | 132.96 t | 56.2 t | Comoros |
| 2010s | 185.27 t | 165.07 t | 20.19 t | Comoros |
| 2020s | 254.23 t | 172.49 t | 81.74 t | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Comoros or Kiribati?
- Comoros, at 246.02 t against 173.47 t in Kiribati as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Comoros and Kiribati?
- 72.55 t, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Kiribati?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Comoros and Kiribati rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Comoros ranks 190th and Kiribati ranks 193rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).