Comoros vs Saint Lucia: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Comoros
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 258.63 t against 246.02 t in Comoros, a difference of 12.61 t.
That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.1 times Comoros's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Comoros ranks 190th and Saint Lucia ranks 189th of 201 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 201.88 t | 541.52 t | 339.64 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1970s | 225.77 t | 1,281 t | 1,055 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1980s | 228.25 t | 468.94 t | 240.69 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1990s | 242.4 t | 576.83 t | 334.43 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2000s | 189.17 t | 347.49 t | 158.32 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 185.27 t | 295.27 t | 110.01 t | Saint Lucia |
| 2020s | 254.23 t | 257.97 t | 3.74 t | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Comoros or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 258.63 t against 246.02 t in Comoros as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Comoros and Saint Lucia?
- 12.61 t, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Saint Lucia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Comoros and Saint Lucia rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Comoros ranks 190th and Saint Lucia ranks 189th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).