Congo vs Qatar: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Congo
- Qatar
How they compare
Congo currently reports 4,017 t against 3,864 t in Qatar, a difference of 153 t.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 160th and Qatar ranks 161st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 5 and Qatar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,510 t | 97.94 t | 1,412 t | Congo |
| 1970s | 2,690 t | 110.28 t | 2,580 t | Congo |
| 1980s | 1,478 t | 176.44 t | 1,302 t | Congo |
| 1990s | 1,523 t | 408.26 t | 1,115 t | Congo |
| 2000s | 1,497 t | 924.44 t | 572.67 t | Congo |
| 2010s | 1,881 t | 2,119 t | 237.59 t | Qatar |
| 2020s | 3,400 t | 3,539 t | 138.23 t | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Congo or Qatar?
- Congo, at 4,017 t against 3,864 t in Qatar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Congo and Qatar?
- 153 t, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Qatar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Qatar rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Congo ranks 160th and Qatar ranks 161st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).