Cook Islands vs Tuvalu: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Cook Islands
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Cook Islands currently reports 138.15 t against 91.86 t in Tuvalu, a difference of 46.29 t.
That makes Cook Islands's figure about 1.5 times Tuvalu's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Cook Islands has been ahead every year.
Cook Islands ranks 195th and Tuvalu ranks 197th of 201 countries.
Cook Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cook Islands | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 72.48 t | 37.54 t | 34.94 t | Cook Islands |
| 1970s | 84.49 t | 38.01 t | 46.48 t | Cook Islands |
| 1980s | 110.74 t | 52.66 t | 58.08 t | Cook Islands |
| 1990s | 188.02 t | 81.38 t | 106.64 t | Cook Islands |
| 2000s | 196.17 t | 87.02 t | 109.15 t | Cook Islands |
| 2010s | 189.31 t | 90.97 t | 98.34 t | Cook Islands |
| 2020s | 147.02 t | 91.96 t | 55.07 t | Cook Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Cook Islands or Tuvalu?
- Cook Islands, at 138.15 t against 91.86 t in Tuvalu as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Cook Islands and Tuvalu?
- 46.29 t, with Cook Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and Tuvalu?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cook Islands and Tuvalu rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Cook Islands ranks 195th and Tuvalu ranks 197th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).