Costa Rica vs Sudan: Input — Cropland potassium

Costa Rica
100,103 t
in 2023
Sudan
98,751 t
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
64th
Sudan rank
65th

Input — Cropland potassium over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Sudan
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 100,103 t against 98,751 t in Sudan, a difference of 1,352 t.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 64th and Sudan ranks 65th of 201 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 96,390 t 99,334 t 2,944 t Sudan
2020s 99,868 t 99,117 t 750.82 t Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Costa Rica or Sudan?
Costa Rica, at 100,103 t against 98,751 t in Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Costa Rica and Sudan?
1,352 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Sudan rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
Costa Rica ranks 64th and Sudan ranks 65th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).