Croatia vs Senegal: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Croatia
- Senegal
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 36,566 t against 35,028 t in Senegal, a difference of 1,538 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Croatia has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 105th and Senegal ranks 107th of 201 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 62,026 t | 14,880 t | 47,146 t | Croatia |
| 2000s | 60,084 t | 18,212 t | 41,872 t | Croatia |
| 2010s | 43,637 t | 25,933 t | 17,704 t | Croatia |
| 2020s | 41,060 t | 33,693 t | 7,367 t | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Croatia or Senegal?
- Croatia, at 36,566 t against 35,028 t in Senegal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Croatia and Senegal?
- 1,538 t, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Senegal?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Senegal rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Croatia ranks 105th and Senegal ranks 107th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).