Czechia vs Serbia: Input — Cropland potassium

Czechia
93,730 t
in 2023
Serbia
97,560 t
in 2023
Czechia rank
69th
Serbia rank
67th

Input — Cropland potassium over time

  • Czechia
  • Serbia
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k199320082023

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 97,560 t against 93,730 t in Czechia, a difference of 3,830 t.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Czechia ranks 69th and Serbia ranks 67th of 201 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 114,168 t 133,976 t 19,808 t Serbia
2010s 105,854 t 121,541 t 15,686 t Serbia
2020s 92,751 t 112,257 t 19,506 t Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Czechia or Serbia?
Serbia, at 97,560 t against 93,730 t in Czechia as of 2023.
What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Czechia and Serbia?
3,830 t, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Czechia and Serbia rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
Czechia ranks 69th and Serbia ranks 67th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Input — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).