Czechoslovakia vs Japan: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Japan
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 295,759 t against 258,192 t in Japan, a difference of 37,567 t.
That makes Czechoslovakia's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Czechoslovakia ahead.
Czechoslovakia ranks 30th and Japan ranks 33rd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechoslovakia averaged higher in 3 and Japan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 629,321 t | 554,441 t | 74,880 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 884,285 t | 614,386 t | 269,899 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 838,325 t | 600,424 t | 237,900 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 435,336 t | 549,555 t | 114,219 t | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Czechoslovakia or Japan?
- Czechoslovakia, at 295,759 t against 258,192 t in Japan as of 1992.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Czechoslovakia and Japan?
- 37,567 t, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Japan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Japan rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 30th and Japan ranks 33rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).