Czechoslovakia vs Nigeria: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Nigeria
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 295,759 t against 263,959 t in Nigeria, a difference of 31,800 t.
That makes Czechoslovakia's figure about 1.1 times Nigeria's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Czechoslovakia ranks 31st and Nigeria ranks 33rd of 201 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 629,321 t | 78,920 t | 550,401 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 884,285 t | 92,836 t | 791,449 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 838,325 t | 142,142 t | 696,183 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 435,336 t | 207,564 t | 227,772 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Czechoslovakia or Nigeria?
- Czechoslovakia, at 295,759 t against 263,959 t in Nigeria as of 1992.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Czechoslovakia and Nigeria?
- 31,800 t, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Nigeria?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Nigeria rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 31st and Nigeria ranks 33rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).