Denmark vs Republic of Korea: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Denmark
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 198,557 t against 192,909 t in Denmark, a difference of 5,648 t.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Denmark ahead.
Denmark ranks 41st and Republic of Korea ranks 40th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 6 and Republic of Korea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 392,811 t | 71,125 t | 321,686 t | Denmark |
| 1970s | 368,196 t | 153,209 t | 214,987 t | Denmark |
| 1980s | 324,331 t | 231,308 t | 93,023 t | Denmark |
| 1990s | 272,084 t | 284,828 t | 12,744 t | Republic of Korea |
| 2000s | 234,073 t | 222,523 t | 11,550 t | Denmark |
| 2010s | 215,456 t | 214,626 t | 830 t | Denmark |
| 2020s | 213,721 t | 202,860 t | 10,862 t | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Denmark or Republic of Korea?
- Republic of Korea, at 198,557 t against 192,909 t in Denmark as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Denmark and Republic of Korea?
- 5,648 t, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Republic of Korea?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Denmark and Republic of Korea rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Denmark ranks 41st and Republic of Korea ranks 40th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).