Djibouti vs Tonga: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Djibouti
- Tonga
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 686.06 t against 599.24 t in Tonga, a difference of 86.82 t.
That makes Djibouti's figure about 1.1 times Tonga's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Djibouti ahead.
Djibouti ranks 177th and Tonga ranks 178th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 5 and Tonga in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 771.99 t | 212.4 t | 559.59 t | Djibouti |
| 1970s | 881.52 t | 398.82 t | 482.7 t | Djibouti |
| 1980s | 501.93 t | 659.25 t | 157.31 t | Tonga |
| 1990s | 581.81 t | 594.87 t | 13.07 t | Tonga |
| 2000s | 658.69 t | 570.55 t | 88.14 t | Djibouti |
| 2010s | 674.46 t | 634.47 t | 40 t | Djibouti |
| 2020s | 684.4 t | 624.69 t | 59.71 t | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Djibouti or Tonga?
- Djibouti, at 686.06 t against 599.24 t in Tonga as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Djibouti and Tonga?
- 86.82 t, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Tonga?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Djibouti and Tonga rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Djibouti ranks 177th and Tonga ranks 178th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).