Dominica vs Guadeloupe: Input — Cropland potassium
Input — Cropland potassium over time
- Dominica
- Guadeloupe
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 454.38 t against 358.12 t in Guadeloupe, a difference of 96.26 t.
That makes Dominica's figure about 1.3 times Guadeloupe's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guadeloupe ahead.
Dominica ranks 181st and Guadeloupe ranks 184th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 2 and Guadeloupe in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Guadeloupe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,017 t | 4,373 t | 2,355 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1970s | 1,938 t | 3,323 t | 1,384 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1980s | 1,088 t | 2,944 t | 1,856 t | Guadeloupe |
| 1990s | 1,308 t | 2,951 t | 1,643 t | Guadeloupe |
| 2000s | 701.26 t | 1,283 t | 581.99 t | Guadeloupe |
| 2010s | 627.13 t | 300.62 t | 326.51 t | Dominica |
| 2020s | 550.54 t | 347.97 t | 202.56 t | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher input — cropland potassium, Dominica or Guadeloupe?
- Dominica, at 454.38 t against 358.12 t in Guadeloupe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in input — cropland potassium between Dominica and Guadeloupe?
- 96.26 t, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Guadeloupe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and Guadeloupe rank globally for input — cropland potassium?
- Dominica ranks 181st and Guadeloupe ranks 184th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Input — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).